Bangladesh's new, positive outlook bodes well for their Test future

In Pallekele, they fielded five specialist bowlers and opted to bat first – not usual for the team at all

Mohammad Isam26-Apr-2021Mominul Haque, the Bangladesh Test captain, expects his team to improve in Tests if they take positive decisions. Like picking five specialist bowlers, as they did in the first Test against Sri Lanka. They also decided to bat after winning the toss. It was a rare occurrence for Bangladesh on foreign soil, considering the greenness of the Pallekele pitch, and it was another positive call.As such, the look of the pitch meant little, scores of 541 for 7 declared, 648 for 8 declared, and 100 for 2 proving that. But the two sides, especially the visitors, would not have known this when they chose their XIs or took a decision at the toss.”If you want to win a Test match in Sri Lanka, you should always have five bowlers in the team,” Haque said. “We were playing a Test after two months, so if someone bowled poorly or got injured, we would have been in more trouble. To get ahead in Test cricket, you should play with five bowlers and six batsmen.”You will always want five bowlers if you want to take 20 wickets. Also, having six batsmen makes everyone take a bit more responsibility. But, while there was some advantage in this decision, there was some risk too. We usually don’t play with six batsmen, but I think we should always play with five bowlers. That’s what big teams do.”The best teams also take first-day conditions head on. Batting first reflected the mindset of the Mominul Haque-Russell Domingo firm. So far, Bangladesh have chosen to bat on all three occasions they have won a toss in an overseas Test.Related

  • Taskin Ahmed creates space for pace in new Bangladesh bowling plan

  • Tamim Iqbal seeks balance between caution and aggression

  • Dead pitch forces Bangladesh seamers to learn through old-fashioned toil

  • More gaps than games – the frustration of being Mominul Haque

Why that is interesting is that Bangladesh hadn’t done such a thing in ten Tests, in more than ten years, prior to the tour of India in November 2019, when they opted to bat in Indore and Kolkata. Between July 2009 and November 2019, Bangladesh only ever fielded first when they had the choice. Mushfiqur Rahim and Shakib Al Hasan were the captains during this period.It’s true that Bangladesh have usually batted first at home or in the subcontinent, but overall in overseas Tests, they have bowled first in 40% of the times they called the coin correctly. And never have they shown an inclination to have first strike when the pitch has looked pace-friendly.But the new way – in India – was criticised. In his first Test as captain, in Indore, Haque was left frustrated by all the questions, while Domingo was belligerent in his responses when asked the same question during the Kolkata Test.”I think when we played overseas (during those years), most of the conditions were bowler-friendly,” Habibul Bashar, the former Bangladesh captain, told ESPNcricinfo. “I think that’s why we used to prefer bowling first. But recently, we have been playing in the subcontinent where it gets difficult to bat in the fourth innings. Maybe this is a reason why we have batted first.”I wouldn’t call it a defensive mindset but we considered the given conditions. In places like West Indies, New Zealand, England and South Africa, there is sideways movement early on in Tests, so often we have tried to take advantage of those conditions.”Over the last couple of years, Bangladesh have mostly been without Shakib, but have still had a very one-dimensional spin-only bowling plan at home. Domingo has stressed on the need to have a more balanced attack at home https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/bangladesh-ditch-all-spin-home-attack-as-domingo-calls-for-balanced-pitches-1217049 so that they can have a proper bowling attack for overseas Tests.It would be interesting to see what type of pitch is dished out for the second Test in Sri Lanka, also in Pallekele, starting on Thursday, But Bangladesh would feel encouraged from the first Test. And that might push them to take more such positive, bold decisions – that is the sort of thing that helps a struggling side get better.

How James Bazley plotted his way back, with a little help from Marnus Labuschagne

The allrounder has impressed for Brisbane Heat after paying his own way back into the game

Alex Malcolm10-Jan-2021They say it takes years to become an overnight success, and that certainly is the case for Brisbane Heat allrounder James Bazley.The 25-year-old Bazley burst into the BBL this season with two outstanding innings in his first two games, scoring 31 not out and 49 not out against the Hobart Hurricanes prompting queries about where he had been hiding.Bazley was hiding in plain sight, having spent three years in the Queensland and Cricket Australia pathways plus a brief spell with the Hurricanes in the 2016-17 season before slipping out of the system at 22.Three years later, having continued to pursue his dream of being a full-time professional cricketer outside the system, and out of his own pocket, he’s finally reaping the rewards.”You get so much coaching in the system that it was to my detriment a little bit when I was a young player,” Bazley told ESPNcricinfo.”I probably listened to too many people all the time. That’s just a natural thing. That’s a young player and they’re trying to help you. So obviously there are no hard feelings or anything there. But it was just a really good lesson for me to learn. You need to know how to coach yourself and work out your processes because at the end of the day that’s how you find a game that you can trust because you know what works and you’ve trusted it.”The BBL is not Bazley’s first taste of professional cricket. He played 13 matches for the Cricket Australia XI between 2014 and 2016, when the CA XI was used as a pathway program for emerging domestic players. That included a T20 against the touring South Africans and a first-class match against West Indies where he made 50 and took four wickets, including bagging Kraigg Brathwaite and Darren Bravo. He also played 11 List A matches when the CA XI was included in Australia’s domestic 50-over competition as a seventh team, made up of young players who were not selected by the six states.The concept was controversial and has since been abandoned. Bazley played in the two largest defeats in Australian domestic 50-over cricket history of 279 runs and 246 runs, where the youngsters were mauled by the likes of Steven Smith, Mitchell Starc, and Shaun Marsh.”I got thrown in there and so did a lot of other young players,” Bazley said. “And it kind of was a bit of sink or swim. For me, I felt like I probably wasn’t quite ready. I felt good enough but I was super young and wasn’t quite ready there and it’s almost like as soon as you don’t perform in those matches then it becomes your own mental battle in your own head about knowing whether I might not be good enough anymore, because I haven’t performed.

“I was basically training as a full-time cricketer without being professional, without getting paid obviously, and then I just had to try and go and do some work around it.”

“Then you worry about the Queensland team not picking you because they’ve seen you not perform there. But I was 20, 21 years old. There are very few players who can really be a dominant cricketer at that age. Looking back now, I’ve made it a good thing because I’ve kept working hard after those years of disappointment and losing my contract and getting back into grade cricket. I’ve made it work because I’ve chosen to make it work.”Bazley’s relationship with Marnus Labuschagne was the catalyst for his return to professional cricket. The pair had grown up together playing junior representative for Queensland and bonded on an interstate trip. When Bazley was contracted to Queensland at 19 he was forced to move from his family home on the Sunshine Coast to Brisbane, and he moved in with the Labuschagne family and stayed for three-and-a-half years.The pair moved out when Labuschagne got married, but Bazley has re-entered the family recently.”I’ve lived with Marnus again, this year, in the Covid period,” Bazley said. “And his lovely wife Rebekah of course who is an absolute legend as well.”The trio are bonded by their strong faith. “My Christian faith has definitely helped me through those years of struggle and disappointment,” Bazley said. “It has given me perspective and hope that I can keep pursuing something I love and I’m passionate about.”That passion drove Bazley, through Labuschagne’s urging, to link up with Labuschagne’s batting coach Neil D’Costa after he lost his contract. He flew to Sydney out of his own pocket to see him.”I used to fly down to him a couple of times in the winter,” he said. “He was just really good for my batting and my training habits and some purpose. He just really taught me how to believe in myself. He didn’t really change my batting much. He just taught me how to believe in myself and he believed in me. So we’ve created a really good partnership.”D’Costa advised him to link up with manager Dean Kino who has also been a source of guidance for both Bazley and Labuschagne. Bazley trained with strength and conditioning coach Louis Ellery and sought counsel from sports psychologist Alan Mantle to help create good routines and visualisation processes.James Bazley takes a wicket against West Indies: ‘I felt good enough but I was super young and wasn’t quite ready’•Getty Images and Cricket Australia”I was basically training as a full-time cricketer without being professional, without getting paid obviously, and then I just had to try and go and do some work around it,” Bazley said. “I was just really professional and structured the last three years, being off-contract, and that’s all paid off in a way.”He has been doing disability support work to bring some balance to his life away from cricket.Bazley’s break came this season when the Heat re-signed him, six years after first adding him as a rookie. He repaid the faith with a four-wicket haul and 158 in grade cricket for Redlands and applied the same mental approach on his BBL debut.”I think the biggest thing for me, being able to play grade cricket and perform well this year, I’ve just created some processes and some routines that I’ve just started to really trust,” he said.”For me then stepping into the Big Bash, I just decided that if it works in grade cricket then why can’t it work in Big Bash. There’s no reason it can’t work. I think that’s been really helpful for me. I haven’t changed anything.”That’s helped me relax and be more comfortable. With the bat in those high-pressure situations, it’s the same thing, I just go through my pre-ball routine, yeah I’m feeling the pressure, but I just know that I give myself the best chance to just watch the ball and play it.”Bazley is now hoping for more opportunity with the ball having bowled just four overs in the tournament, despite feeling it is his strong suit.”It’s funny actually, after that first game I batted pretty well and didn’t bowl and everyone thought I was a batter but I’m probably even a bowling allrounder to be fair,” Bazley said. “But I’m trying to be a genuine allrounder. We’ve got a lot of allrounder’s in our team so I’ve just got to be patient with ball. The overs will come I’m sure.”Bazley is still dreaming big despite the rollercoaster ride to this point.”I’d love to play all formats,” Bazley said. “I’d love to play for Queensland in 50-over and Shield cricket. I’d love to go and play for Australia at some point but it’s just about trying to perform well wherever you’re playing.”

The Hundred play-off scenarios: Five men's teams in contention, Brave and Invincibles eye women's final

The race for qualification is hotting up going into the final round of group games

Sampath Bandarupalli29-Aug-2022Related

Sam Curran, Will Jacks keep Oval Invincibles' qualification hopes alive

Mady Villiers four-for, London Spirit rumbled for 80 as Invincibles qualify

Sophie Ecclestone stars with bat and ball as Manchester Originals keep play-off hopes alive

Hartley takes four as Originals hammer Phoenix to close in on knockout spot

Trent Rockets currently top the table in the men’s Hundred•ECB/Getty ImagesMen’s tournament
Match 29, Trent Rockets (Wins 5) vs Welsh Fire (Wins 0):
Trent Rockets have the best chance to strengthen their case for direct qualification to the final, alongside sealing their berth in the play-offs. They face Welsh Fire in their last league game, a team that has lost all seven matches. A win in this fixture will make Rockets the first team to qualify for the play-offs this season, but their place in the final depends on net run rate (NRR). Rockets are about five runs ahead of London Spirit’s NRR, the only other team who can finish on 12 points.Rockets would then hope Spirit either lose to Birmingham Phoenix or the winning margin be no more than five runs better than their victory margin against Welsh Fire. Rockets can still seal their play-offs qualification even if they lose against Welsh Fire, if their losing margin is no more than 48 runs (In a 150-run chase) or 31 balls to spare. If Rockets lose by a heavier margin, they will need to root for Spirit to win against Phoenix or lose by a narrow margin on Tuesday.Match 30, London Spirit (Wins 5) vs Birmingham Phoenix (Wins 4):
A 79-run defeat against Manchester Originals has left Birmingham Phoenix on the brink of elimination. However, they still have an outside chance of making it to the play-offs. They will need a big win in their last league match against London Spirit – by 42 runs or 28 balls to spare approximately. Any win margin less than that would end their road in the tournament unless Rockets lose by more than 48 runs to Welsh Fire on Monday, which would be an unlikely result.While Phoenix aim for a huge win to qualify for the play-offs, Spirit will be making their calculations to get a direct place in the final. If Rockets lose against Fire, a win would be enough for Spirit to make it to Lord’s. However, if Rockets win on Monday, Spirit will need a winning margin against Phoenix that is about six runs higher than Rockets’ win margin.Match 32, Manchester Originals (Wins 4) vs Oval Invincibles (Wins 4):
The final league game of the season between Manchester Originals and Oval Invincibles will be a virtual play-off to finish in the top three. The winning team gets closer to the title, while the losing team gets knocked out. If Rockets and Spirit lose their respective final league matches, the winning team among Originals and Invincibles will likely qualify directly for the final based on their better NRR.Birmingham Phoenix were on the brink of qualification before defeat to Manchester Originals•Getty ImagesWomen’s tournament
Southern Brave or Oval Invincibles – Battle for top spot:
Southern Brave, despite winning all the five matches they played, not yet assured of a direct route to the final. A win over Northern Superchargers in their last game would guarantee top spot, but they can achieve this despite a loss if second-placed Oval Invincibles do not win big in their final league match against Manchester Originals. If Brave lose to Superchargers by ten runs (in a 125-run chase), Invincibles should not win by more than 11 runs or six balls (in the case of a first-innings total of 125).Birmingham Phoenix – Wins 3, Points 6:
Birmingham Phoenix were a win away from securing their top three finish, but an 18-run loss against Manchester Originals on Sunday left the table open. They now face threats from Trent Rockets, Originals and Superchargers, all tied on four points.If Phoenix can defeat London Spirit in their last league game, they will bin all the scenarios and join Brave and Invincibles in the play-offs. If Rockets win by 12 or more runs, or with ten or more balls to spare (assuming a first-innings total of 125) against Welsh Fire, they will put Phoenix in a position where they cannot afford to lose in their last match.Rockets, Originals and Superchargers – What are their chances?
Trent Rockets are more likely to finish in the top three than Originals and Superchargers, due to their better NRR. However, all three teams would need Phoenix to lose against Spirit on Tuesday. The margin of Phoenix’s defeat will not matter for Rockets if they get the better of Welsh Fire by 12 runs or ten balls. But Originals and Superchargers will need big wins for qualification as they are currently 33 and 42 runs behind the Phoenix’s NRR.

England in Pakistan: A history of controversy

Among the draws – all 18 of them – there have been protests, flare-ups and the odd moment of success

Andrew Miller29-Nov-2022After consecutive “home” series on neutral ground in the UAE, Pakistan are finally set to host England for their first Test visit in 17 years. It promises the renewal of a rivalry that has not exactly been packed with tense contests down the years, but has produced an extraordinary amount of controversy. Here’s a recap of England’s eight previous tours.1961-62 – England won 1-0
A curious itinerary greeted MCC’s first official tour of Pakistan, with the three-match series wrapped either side of a full five-Test visit to India – whose subsequent plans to tour West Indies had caused a fixtures rejig. And as it transpired, the one-off Test in Lahore in October could not have been further removed from the two follow-ups in Dacca and Karachi in January and February, where the tone would be set for a diet of lifeless decks over the subsequent two decades. By then, however, England were already 1-0 up in the series after a gripping final-hour win in Lahore, where the new captain Ted Dexter marshalled a high-tempo run-chase with the elan he would soon be bringing to the new-fangled Gillette One-Day Cup. It would be England’s only victory in the country for 39 years, and one of only two to date in 24 Tests and counting.Ted Dexter (second left) and members of the England touring party after returning from Pakistan in 1962•Hulton Archive/Getty Images1968-69 – Series drawn 0-0
South Africa had been England’s original winter destination, but the D’Oliveira Affair put paid to that prospect, and as MCC scouted around for a back-up plan, they hit upon a country that was lurching, with ever more volatile certainty, towards revolution. “The Pakistan tour was a fiasco”, Wisden intoned, at the end of a stalemate in which the three Tests became focal points for mounting unrest, from the first day of the series in Lahore, to the third and final day of the third Test in Karachi, where play was abandoned after a mob had torn down the gates and vandalised the pitch. In between, the schedule was controversially rejigged to send the teams 1100 miles east to Dacca (now Dhaka), where law and order was already breaking down ahead of the bloody war that would, two years later, lead to the birth of Bangladesh. With the city in a state of siege, it was left to a group of teenaged student leaders to guarantee the team’s safety. On the field, a quartet of England centuries were the tour’s stand-out performances: Colin Cowdrey in Lahore, D’Oliveira in Dacca, and Colin Milburn and Tom Graveney in Karachi, where Graveney struck two intruders on their backsides with his bat, and quipped: “They were the two best strokes I made on the whole tour.”1972-73 – Series drawn 0-0
An arduous four-month tour, encompassing five Tests in India, three in Pakistan and a first-class stop-over in the newly-renamed Sri Lanka, came to a dispiriting end on a trio of pitches in Lahore, Hyderabad and Karachi that, Wisden moaned, would still have ended as draws “had they gone on playing for the rest of their lives”. That said, England were twice obliged to guard against mishap after conceding challenging leads in the first two Tests, but on neither occasion were they bowled out in their second innings. The Karachi Test, once again, was marred by crowd unrest and pitch invasions, and was eventually abandoned early due to a dust-storm, after Norman Gifford’s five-for had briefly given England hope of a win against the head. The match also happened to be the last of Tony Lewis’s brief reign as captain – he would play one more Test back in the ranks before being dropped for good the following summer – but its most notable detail was arguably the fact that Majid Khan, Mushtaq Mohammad and Dennis Amiss were all dismissed for 99.Shakoor Rana and Mike Gatting infamously faced-off in Faisalabad on the 1987-88 tour•Getty Images1977-78 – Series drawn 0-0
By the end of another chaotic campaign, England had played 12 Tests across 16 years of touring in Pakistan, and drawn each of the last 11 – a record that Wisden attributed to various factors including food, accommodation, crowd indiscipline and “a shadowy political background” but, most of all, to the hosts’ “obsessive fear of defeat”. The emergence of the legspinner Abdul Qadir seemed to offer Pakistan the means to unlock their own benign surfaces – most particularly in the second Test in Hyderabad, where he exploited the rough created by Bob Willis’s heavy-limbed followthrough to take a first-innings 6 for 44. However, Wasim Bari’s overly cautious declaration killed off any remaining jeopardy, and not for the first time, the tour’s main talking points came off the field: the riots in Lahore that stemmed from a premature celebration of Mudassar Nazar’s century, then the threatened recall of the so-called “Packerstanis” – Imran Khan, Mushtaq Mohammad and Zaheer Abbas – all of whom had signed to play in Kerry Packer’s inaugural season of World Series Cricket, but whose arrivals in Karachi prior to the third Test caused uproar. It wasn’t entirely clear at whose behest they had turned up – it might even have been a publicity stunt from Packer himself – but at the eleventh hour, the Pakistan board confirmed that they would not be considered, and the threat of an England boycott fell away.1983-84 – Pakistan won 1-0
Qadir’s threat was no secret this time around, but his mastery of flight and variation remained unfathomable to England. Barely three days after arriving from a chaotic tour of New Zealand – one beset by injury, ineptitude and subsequent accusations of recreational drug use – England rocked up to the first “result” wicket that they had encountered in more than a decade of Pakistan tours, and finished a distant second-best in a misleadingly tight three-wicket loss. Nick Cook claimed 11 wickets to Qadir’s eight, but the legspinner’s bamboozling display was best epitomised by a stunning googly that Ian Botham was barely able to pick even after it had nestled in short-leg’s hands. “Only a philistine could watch Qadir without fascination,” wrote John Thicknesse in The Cricketer. He was briefly neutered on a dead deck in Faisalabad, but burst back to prominence with ten wickets at Lahore as the series ended amid a compelling tussle for the upper hand. Going into the rest day with England still trailing on their second innings, England’s captain David Gower – by now deputising for the injured Willis – promised positivity in a bid to square the series, and delivered in person with a magnificent 173. But, after Mohsin Khan and Shoaib Mohammad had matched that total in their opening stand, Gower rather went back on his word with a go-slow in the field, and it took a late five-for from Norman Cowans to guard against an unlikely defeat.Nasser Hussain and Graham Thorpe celebrate victory in the dark, Karachi 2000•Getty Images1987-88 – Pakistan won 1-0
Bad blood abounded in one of the most acrimonious series of all time. Mike Gatting’s infamous finger-jabbing row with umpire Shakoor Rana in Faisalabad was the image that flashed around the globe in an embodiment of the “it’s not cricket!” cliché that the sport still, somehow, clings to to this day. And yet, their stand-off was very much in keeping with the animosity that existed between England and Pakistan throughout the 1980s, as years of festering grievances home and away came to an inevitable climax. Barely four months had elapsed since Pakistan had prevailed on an ill-tempered tour of England, during which complaints about the home umpiring – specifically an old adversary, David Constant – had been batted away by the TCCB. Factor in a draining World Cup campaign in between whiles, in which England’s defeat in the final had matched Pakistan’s semi-final elimination on home soil in the anti-climax stakes, and the time was hardly ripe to renew such a fractious rivalry. The fuse was lit during the first Test at Lahore, where umpire Shakeel Khan gave – by England’s count – nine erroneous decisions, among them Chris Broad, who had to be persuaded to leave the crease by his opening partner, Graham Gooch. The irony was that, with 9 for 56 in the first innings, en route to a series haul of 30 at 14.56, Qadir hardly needed a leg-up to be the difference between the teams. Even so, when the flashpoint came, late on the second day in Faisalabad, it was with England in a position of rare dominance – with Pakistan five-down in their first innings and still almost 200 runs behind. But the loss of the third day’s play, with Rana refusing to officiate until Gatting had issued a grudging written apology, kiboshed any hope of a result.2000-01 – England won 1-0
Fresh from their first victory over West Indies in three decades, Nasser Hussain’s England sealed another famous series win, and in incredible circumstances too, with the winning runs in Karachi coming amid ever-encroaching darkness on the final day of the tour. The advent of central contracts and the appointment of Duncan Fletcher as head coach had been significant factors in a heightened team cohesion, but ultimately this tour was a triumph for Hussain’s hard-bitten leadership – in particular his insistence that England “stay in the game at all costs”, and wait for the pressure to tell on their hosts. Graham Thorpe epitomised this indomitability with a grindingly slow century in Lahore, which contained a solitary boundary in his first 100 runs and in the process thwarted Saqlain Mushtaq, whose eight wickets in the innings came at a cost of 164, and despite a wobble in Faisalabad, they were never seriously in danger of defeat. Then, in Karachi, Mike Atherton responded to Inzamam and Yousuf’s twin hundreds with a ten-hour 125, spanning 430 balls at a tempo slower even than his great Johannesburg rearguard – an effort that the Telegraph correspondent Michael Henderson had described as “insufferable”. Its impact, however, soon became apparent as Pakistan – in what would these days be acknowledged as a “tricky third innings” – chose neither to stick nor twist in stumbling to 158 all out. England’s target, then, was 176 in 44 overs, a chase that Atherton himself ignited with a sprightly 26 from 33. Moin Khan, Pakistan’s captain, was unconcerned, knowing full well that the fast-setting winter sun would come to his aid if he slowed the game down. But umpire Steve Bucknor was having none of it, and – with England’s 12th man Matthew Hoggard dispatched to sightscreen duties – Thorpe donned his night-vision goggles to seal a famous win with an under-edged cut through fine leg, and with mere minutes of serviceable light to spare.Marcus Trescothick bats during his 180-run stand with Ian Bell in Multan•Getty Images2005-06 – Pakistan won 2-0
After the extraordinary highs of the 2005 Ashes, England crashed back to earth in a thoroughly dispiriting fashion in Pakistan, with a brace of defeats – one agonisingly close, the other crushingly complete – that epitomised the sudden dismantling of a fleetingly world-class team. Already lacking Simon Jones through injury, the loss of the captain Michael Vaughan to a knee injury was a further grievous blow, although one that his stand-in Marcus Trescothick seemed to have taken in his stride in leading from the front with a brilliant 193 in the first Test in Multan – sadly the mental toll of that effort would only become apparent in hindsight. In between whiles, Andrew Flintoff bowled supremely to drive England towards victory, only for Shoaib Akhtar and Danish Kaneria – in a classical Pakistani pace/legspin double act – to swipe the match by 22 runs in a breathless finish. Inzamam-ul-Haq’s twin hundreds in Faisalabad scotched England’s attempts at a fightback, and when Mohammad Yousuf racked up a career-best 223 in the third Test in Lahore, the end was meek and inevitable. Despite the heightened security surrounding the tour, England’s first post 9/11, there was little sign at that juncture that they would not be returning for another two decades.

South Africa women overcome national nemesis to beat India

Touring South African teams don’t generally fare well against spin, but not this one

Firdose Moonda17-Mar-2021It’s rare that a South African team can walk away from a series in India and claim superiority. The men’s side have won one out eight Test rubbers, one out of five bilateral ODI series and one of out of two T20s match-ups. Before Sunday, the women’s team had won one out of two ODI series in India. Now, not only have they successfully secured a second trophy, by the biggest margin a South African team has earned in India (4-1), but they did it by overcoming a national nemesis: spin.In losing 13 wickets to India’s spinners across the five matches at an average of 53.15 and a strike rate of 70.7 (one wicket to every 11.5 overs of spin) South Africa subjected the home tweakers to their worst result in a series where they have bowled at least 100 overs and significantly worse than the last time they played South Africa. Then, in a three-match series in 2019, India’s spinners took 18 wickets at 19.05, struck every 5.2 overs and squeezed South Africa at only 3.53 runs an over.”Two years back when we toured here India demolished us with their spin,” stand-in captain Sune Luus said. “But we had a Pakistan series before this and we played in Durban which is kind of subcontinental in its conditions. India bowled a lot of spin to us but we found ways to attack. We knew they were just going to throw a lot of overs of spin at us and we were mentally ready for that.”In January, South Africa hosted Pakistan for three ODIs and three T20s, all at Kingsmead. Against the likes of Nida Dar and Nashra Sandhu, they won the ODIs 3-0 and the T20s 2-1 and performed well against the spinners. In the ODIs,11 out of 26 South African dismissals in the series came against spin and they scored at 4.01 runs to the over. In the T20s, they lost six out of 11 wickets to spin and scored at 6.01.That preparation has proved invaluable and it also gave South Africa much-needed match-practice and the opportunity to develop the habit of winning.South Africa won the first two ODIs against Pakistan against by slender margins (three runs and 13 runs), both times defending totals. In this series, after two one-sided matches, the results got closer to each other. South Africa had to beat both India and the weather in the third match, recorded their highest successful chase in the fourth and snuck home in a low-scoring thriller in the finale.Sune Luus’ unbeaten fifty included five fours and two sixes•Getty ImagesAfter developing a reputation for falling at the final hurdle in heartbreaking performances like the semi-final of the last fifty-over World Cup in Bristol or the semi-final of the T20 World Cup last March in Sydney, it seems as though South Africa have found ways to hold their nerve in tense situations. “The more games you play, the more you get yourself into pressure situations which you need to get through, We’ve been in enough pressure situations to identify where we are struggling and where we can get better,” Luus said. “If you look at teams like Australia and England, they’ve played a lot of games and been in a lot of semi-finals and finals and they can handle pressure. We need to keep on getting into semi-finals and work through that to get to finals. We are a world class team that have been working hard for a lot of years and we really want to be on top of the world and to compete with Australia and England and I think we are there. The more games you play, especially against teams like India, Australia, England, the more you can learn how to deal with pressure.”All that would be ideal if the women’s World Cup was being played as originally planned, now. Instead, it has been pushed back to March 2022 and South Africa will want to maintain this form for another 12 months. Luus believes they can do that by continuing to find similarities between the matches they play now and big-tournament situations. “If we are looking towards the World Cup next year in New Zealand, they have high scoring grounds and so that’s (like the fourth match) type of totals we are going to be chasing or setting. It was a good experience now to get the feel for it and see how you manage a chase, when you start going, when you hold back and when you just rotate strike,” Luus said. “All five games were different scenarios and that’s the experience we are going to need for the World Cup.”South Africa’s victory in India puts them second on the ODI rankings, their highest to date, with Lizelle Lee on top of the batting charts, Shabnim Ismail and Marizanne Kapp at No.3 and 4 on the bowling list and Kapp the third-highest allrounder, their stocks are rising. This series also showed off several lower-profile players – Lara Goodall, Anneke Bosch and Tumi Sekhukhune – which suggests there’s depth in the talent pool and plenty for South Africa to work with.”We are so excited to win the series in India. It’s a very special achievement for our team. It’s never easy to play here and take the series away from the Indian team like we did.” Luus said. “We can go into the T20 series smiling because our fifty-over game is coming together very nicely.”

Stats – Post-30 Jimmy: How Anderson has become better with age

Anderson’s story is remarkable because of the improvement he’s shown with his bowling in this period

S Rajesh11-Feb-2021When James Anderson defeated the defences of Ajinkya Rahane with a stunner on the final day of the Chennai Test, he went on top of the list for most wickets taken by a fast bowler after the age of 30. That wicket was Anderson’s 342nd after turning 30, and he later added Rishabh Pant to that tally as well, to increase his lead over Courtney Walsh (341) on this list.This should say a lot about Anderson’s fitness levels, and his story is even more remarkable because of the improvement he’s shown with his bowling in this period.ESPNcricinfo LtdAnderson turned 30 on July 30, 2012. Since then, he has averaged 23.45 in 87 Tests. Among the 15 fast bowlers who have taken 150 or more wickets during this period, only three – Pat Cummins, Dale Steyn and Kagiso Rabada – have better averages. None of them, though, has taken even 60% of the number of wickets Anderson has taken in this period. In the 71 Tests Anderson played before turning 30, he averaged 30.37, which means his average has improved by almost 23% since he turned 30.ESPNcricinfo LtdBefriending the older ball
When Anderson started out he was excellent with the new ball but with the older ball in hand, he wasn’t quite as effective. In the 71 Tests he played before turning 30, he averaged 27.67 in the first 15 overs of an innings, but between overs 16 and 80, he conceded 34.54 runs per wicket.ESPNcricinfo LtdOver the last eight-and-a-half years, though, the skillset has gradually expanded to include reverse swing, cutters, changes of length, pace and angle, and greater cricketing nous which comes with experience. Not only does he have a wider range of skills now, but also seems to have a much clearer idea of the execution.The results are there for all to see. Since August 2012, Anderson’s average in the first 15 overs has improved marginally – from 27.67 to 25.09 – but in the 16 to 80 overs range, the difference is stark: from 34.54, the average has dropped to 24.16, an improvement of 30%.Among the 23 fast bowlers who have bowled at least 500 overs during this phase of an innings in this period, only three have better averages – the South African trio of Rabada, Steyn and Vernon Philander.ESPNcricinfo LtdOvercoming the Asian challenge
For a bowler like Anderson, whose innate strength is the ability to swing the ball, doing well in Asia is a huge challenge. Before 2012, he played only five Tests in the continent, taking 12 wickets at 45.41. Then, in early 2012 – just before he turned 30 – he played back-to-back series in the UAE against Pakistan and in Sri Lanka. Though he didn’t take a huge number of wickets – 18 in five Tests – he was giving little away: those 18 wickets came at an average of 24.72, and an economy rate of 2.46.That was followed by a solid series in India, and though he had a lean time in Asia between 2016 and 2018, he has bounced back superbly this time around: he had a match haul of 6 for 46 in Galle, which was followed by 5 for 63 against India in Chennai. Since turning 30, Anderson concedes nearly nine fewer runs per wicket in Asia, compared to his numbers before he turned 30.ESPNcricinfo LtdHowever, with Anderson, it’s not only the wickets that matter; it’s also the control he provides to the team with his ability to choke the run-flow: among the 13 non-Asian fast bowlers who have bowled at least 200 overs in Asia since the beginning of 2012, Anderson’s economy rate of 2.4 is the best, marginally better than Philander’s 2.5.The extra bows in Anderson’s armoury have been even more useful in Asia, as they have made him a threat even with the older ball, something that wasn’t necessarily true in the early days of his career. Before he turned 30, Anderson averaged 47.77 runs per wicket between overs 16 and 80, and had a strike rate of 101 balls per wicket. Since then, the average has improved to 22.72. Nowhere was that improvement more evident than in the 27th over of India’s second innings in Chennai, when those two wickets of Shubman Gill and Rahane decisively swung the game England’s way.ESPNcricinfo LtdHowever, his numbers in Australia haven’t improved as dramatically – he averaged 35.79 in eight Tests there before turning 30, and 35.09 in ten Tests since then – but his last series there was pretty impressive: 17 wickets at 27.82, conceding just 2.11 runs per over.ESPNcricinfo LtdThe matchwinner
In the post-30 phase of Anderson’s career, England have won 37 of 87 matches he has been part of, and in those 37 wins, Anderson has taken 170 wickets at a stunning average of 16.43. Among the 23 bowlers who have taken at least 75 wickets in wins during this period, no one has a better average. In defeats or draws, the average goes up to 30.36. His numbers in wins illustrate just how important Anderson is, even at 38, to England’s Test fortunes.

Myburgh or Brathwaite, Gul or Afridi – vote for the greatest T20 World Cup performance

Two sensational efforts from Pakistan pace bowlers, a blitz from a Netherlands batter and a stunning performance in a World Cup final

ESPNcricinfo staff17-Oct-2022 • Updated on 18-Oct-2022Voting for these match-ups has ended. Carlos Brathwaite’s 3-23 & 34* and Umar Gul’s 5-6 move to the quarter-finals.Stephan Myburgh’s 63 vs Carlos Brathwaite’s 3-23 & 34*63 (23) vs IRE | Stephan Myburgh | Sylhet, 2014
To qualify for the Super 10, Netherlands needed to vault from No. 3 to No. 1 in the group on net run-rate, which left them having to score 190 runs in 14.2 overs against Ireland – odds most teams might think would rule them out. But Stephan Myburgh was the master mathematician. He took three sixes off offspinner Andy McBrine’s first over and three more off Alex Cusack to bring up the team fifty in 3.1 overs. They got to 91 by the time the powerplay ended with Myburgh bringing up his own fifty in only 17 balls, which at the time was the second-fastest in the format. Not long after that, he was toasting a victory that even now seems unbelievable.Related

RP Singh or Yuvraj, Malinga or Herath – vote for the greatest T20 World Cup performance

RP Singh or Kohli, Watson or Herath – vote for the greatest T20 World Cup performance

The greatest T20 World Cup performance – how the fans voted

Hussey or Samuels, Afridi or Hales – vote for the greatest T20 World Cup performance

Yuvraj or Mitchell, Malinga or Buttler – vote for the greatest T20 World Cup performance

3-23 & 34*(10) vs ENG | Carlos Brathwaite | Kolkata, 2016
Nineteen to win in the final over. Four balls, four sixes. “Carlos Brathwaite, remember the name”. Those hits at Eden Gardens will forever remain part of cricketing folklore. What gets forgotten is that Brathwaite was effective with the ball too: he picked up the key wickets of Jos Buttler and Joe Root to finish with figures of 4-0-23-3. He then came in at No. 8 with West Indies 107 for 6 in 15.3 chasing 156, and took West Indies to their second title in the company of Marlon Samuels.ESPNcricinfo LtdUmar Gul’s 5-6 vs Shaheen Shah Afridi’s 3-315-6 vs NZ | Umar Gul | The Oval, 2009
New Zealand were 72 for 4 when Umar Gul, Pakistan’s death-overs specialist, came on in the 13th over, and took five of the next six wickets to knock out the opposition for 99. Gul’s impact was instantaneous and devastating: he dismissed Scott Styris and Peter McGlashan with his third and fourth deliveries, sent Nathan McCullum’s leg stump cartwheeling in his next over, and ended with the dismissals of James Franklin and Kyle Mills – again off consecutive balls – in his third.3-31 vs IND | Shaheen Shah Afridi | Dubai, 2021
Shaheen Shah Afridi removed India’s top three batters in a sensational performance that set up their maiden win over India in men’s World Cups. Afridi, with a reputation for striking in the first over, welcomed Rohit Sharma with a yorker that swung into his pads and trapped him lbw. With the first ball of his second over, KL Rahul was bowled when he tried to play one to leg with the angle as it came in to him. And later in the 19th over, Afridi got Virat Kohli to top-edge a slow bouncer to the keeper.ESPNcricinfo Ltd

India get the better of Australia, one flick at a time

A look at how this unglamorous shot made all the difference for India, and why Australia could not employ it effectively themselves

Karthik Krishnaswamy19-Feb-2023Cheteshwar Pujara faced five of the last six balls of the Delhi Test match. First, he levelled the scores with a flicked single to deep square leg after skipping out to Travis Head. Then, getting the strike back at the start of the next over, he played two more flicks off Todd Murphy, one to square leg, one to short midwicket.After another dot ball not involving a flick, Pujara hit the winning runs: down the track again, and a firm whip over midwicket for four.Five balls, four variants of the leg-side flick. And in that lay a story, perhaps even story of the 2022-23 Border-Gavaskar Trophy.The flick can be a delightful stroke to watch, but it isn’t always a glamorous one. ESPNcricinfo, for instance, runs a video series titled , where current or former players pick their favourite exponents of eight shots that circle the dial: straight drive, cover drive, cut, reverse-sweep, scoop, sweep, pull and the lofted hit down the ground. The flick, as you may have noticed, isn’t one of them.The flick, however, is the Test batter’s run-scoring lifeblood. Since the start of 2021, according to ESPNcricinfo’s data, the flick has brought batters more Test runs than any other shot – 17,697, to be precise – with the cover drive way behind in second place at 12,979.Related

Andrew McDonald: Australia batters wilted under 'perceived pressure'

Jadeja and Axar: Sweep and reverse sweep are difficult here

The ladders have gone, only snakes lurk in Rahul's Test path right now

India almost through to WTC final after beating Australia in Delhi

Rohit: 'The confidence Jadeja has in his ability is massive'

In that time, batters have played the flick a whopping 22,373 times. It’s in third place behind defended (62,637) and left alone (25,277), of course, but those aren’t scoring shots.The reason why the flick is such a key part of Test cricket is simple. Bowlers target the top of off stump constantly, and when they miss their lines and lengths at Test level, they usually only miss it by small margins. So while the rank long-hop and the wide half-volley are rare occurrences, the ball that’s a touch straighter than ideal, or a touch fuller or shorter, is more frequent. Test batters can flick balls from all sorts of lines and lengths – if the angle is just right, a back-of-a-length ball can be worked to deep backward square leg from a fourth-stump line.Spinners are particularly prone to getting flicked, and not just with the turn. Top batters can use their feet to get to the pitch of the ball, or go deep in their crease to give themselves time, and twirl their wrists to play the shot against the turn too. Because of the pace spinners bowl at, their margin for error is smaller, and the more turn there is, the smaller that margin becomes – the ball turning into the batter is likelier to end up on the pads, and the ball turning away is likelier to start from a line closer to leg stump.The first two Tests of the Border-Gavaskar Trophy have been played on pitches with plenty of help for the spinners, and the margins for error have consequently been fairly small.Over these two Tests in Nagpur and Delhi, India’s batters have been able to play the flick far more frequently against the spinners than Australia’s batters. They’ve also had to defend significantly fewer balls.There are many ways of looking at these numbers. You could say Indian batters are naturally wristy and fond of playing the flick. You could say they use their feet better to get down the pitch or go deep in the crease, to create opportunities to play the flick. You could say that the two teams have employed different batting gameplans, India’s revolving around positive footwork and shots down the ground or through the on side, and Australia’s around the sweep.This last argument is particularly compelling if you watched the closing stages of the Delhi Test, and watched and read the post-mortems. Australia lost a lot of wickets to sweeps and reverse-sweeps, and India barely ever played those shots. The experts shook their heads and told you how unwise these shots were on this third-day surface, where the ball was frequently shooting through low.But here’s the thing. Australia’s players and team management know this. They know how dangerous cross-bat shots can be on pitches like this. But R Ashwin and Ravindra Jadeja have bowled with the sort of control that has left them with few other scoring options. They’re certainly not getting drive balls and cut balls, and they’re not getting a whole lot of flick balls either.They’ve chosen two different responses to this challenge in the two Tests of this series. In the second innings in Nagpur, Australia defended for their lives and were bowled out in 32.3 overs. In the second innings in Delhi, they swept at everything and were bowled out in 31.1 overs. Their captain Pat Cummins said their batters had underplayed their hand in Nagpur and overplayed it in Delhi.Against spinners with the control of Ashwin and Jadeja and on pitches with both turn and natural variation, those can be the only options for visiting batters. Neither is the right answer, but there’s no real middle way either, unless the bowlers have an off day.In the given conditions, the sweep shot was fraught with danger, but Australia were left with little choice•Getty ImagesAnd in Delhi, the sweep helped Australia compete on a level footing with India over the first two days. It was a defining feature of Usman Khawaja’s 81 on day one, and of Marnus Labuschagne’s batting when Australia raced away to a quick start in the third session of day two.The sweep, therefore, was a symptom of Australia’s problems and not its cause.And the problem hasn’t been that they’re a bad team. The problem is that they’re just not as good as India in Indian conditions. You would only back a handful of teams over the game’s history to beat this Indian team in Indian conditions.Australia’s spin attack on this tour is among the best that has visited this country in a decade – Nathan Lyon is a world-class offspinner with more than 450 Test wickets, while Todd Murphy and Matthew Kuhnemann have bowled with terrific control for visiting spinners who’ve made their Test debuts on this tour. They’ve bowled with better control than a lot of overseas spinners who’ve come to India with a lot more Test experience, and they’ve barely bowled any long-hops or genuine half-volleys.But it’s only natural that Australia’s spinners don’t have the inch-perfect control of Jadeja and Ashwin on Indian pitches. The margins for error are tiny. Minute errors in line and length don’t leap at you in real time, but they all add up over the course of a series, one flick at a time.

Block, grind, restraint: The rise and rise of Shafali Verma

Her Test debut was as much a vindication of her talent as it was a bulldozing of perceptions around it

Annesha Ghosh20-Jun-20216:00

Mithali Raj – ‘I’m mightily impressed with the debutants’

Mohit Sharma remembers seeing some of the traits before. The intrepid strokeplay, the solidity in defence, the clarity in approach, the seeming lack of nerves. “Never before had I seen a girl bat like that or with that kind of an easy, fearless attitude,” he recounts.Sharma, who last played for the India men’s team in 2015, followed the England vs India Bristol Test on TV. “This is the first time I’ve had the opportunity to watch women play Test cricket,” he says over a phone call. But there’s an element of familiarity to this novel experience of his.About five months ago, at a camp of the Haryana men’s team, the domestic side he represents, Sharma played some half a dozen practice matches against Shafali Verma. And bowled at her at the nets, too. So the 96 and 63 that Verma, 17, scored in the one-off Test, becoming the youngest woman to hit twin fifties on Test debut, wasn’t entirely surprising to him.”At the camp, Shafali would handle the new ball with ease,” Sharma recalls. “It didn’t matter to her if the pacers were clocking 135kph or higher, or what the stature or skillsets of the bowlers were. In all of those five-six matches, she confidently survived a good 15-18 overs opening the batting. So, scoring runs wasn’t her only achievement.”That rang true for Verma’s performance in Bristol, too. She batted for the better part of days two and three, and a part of the morning session on day four, trying to get the better of England’s 396 first-innings tally and then a follow-on deficit of 165. The 235 balls she faced across the two innings, the second-most by an India debutant in women’s Tests, were as much a vindication of her talent as it was a bulldozing of perceptions around it.Shafali Verma became the youngest woman to hit twin fifties on Test debut•Getty ImagesBefore this Test, 75 percent of her 617 international runs had come in boundaries. Capped only in T20Is, her 29 sixes, the most by any woman player in T20Is since her debut in September 2019, and her No.1 ranking in the format, have been a testament to her ability. In the Test against England, her record three sixes, the most by a woman Test debutant, did her reputation as a big-hitter no harm.But broken down to its individual components, her Player-of-the-Match winning debut was remarkable also because of its more elemental, less dazzling facets. The blocking, the grinding, the restraint, all high elbow, supple wrists – and doing it for prolonged phases of play.”Shafali, [as] we know, does have a range of shots and she can be very effective in a format like this if she gets going,” Mithali Raj, the India Test and ODI captain, said after the match. “In no time, we could see the score would be somewhere else if she gets going. And once we knew it’s a used wicket and there won’t be much movement, we thought it would be a good time to give her a Test debut, and she lived up to it.”Related

  • Shafali Verma's matchup dominance against Katherine Brunt sets career tone

  • Interview – Verma: 'I played 150 bouncers at a time'

  • Stats: Debutants take the limelight on the return of Test cricket

  • Mithali: The girls have shown they can stand up even without much practice

  • Shafali's target on Test debut: 'Learn about choosing the right balls to play'

Before her dismissal in the second innings, Verma’s approach in the opening half-hour of the final day was a study in character as well as a test of it. Sophie Ecclestone, the No. 1-ranked bowler in T20Is, began with a slip and a short leg in place. Her left-arm spin was angled largely into the body, with the drift playing its part, and Verma responded with only forward presses and straight-bat back-foot plods.Three overs later, in Ecclestone’s third on the day, Verma threatened to cut loose, starting with an inside-out shot, right off the middle of the bat, over the bowler’s head. The tossed-up delivery carried all the way over the fence. Restraint be damned.The start to the over was reminiscent of the momentum-changing four she struck off Brunt on day two en route to her record 167-run opening stand with Smriti Mandhana. The end to that over, with Verma having offered up a catch off Ecclestone, was a reminder that the Bristol Test was, after all, the teenager’s first competitive red-ball game.”Personally, [I felt] her fifty in the second innings was a very beautiful fifty,” Raj said. “The 96 she scored was a good knock, but the fifty came with a little more sorted head and a little more experience. The sweetly timed drives… It was beautiful to watch her.”Verma was dismissed long before India saved the match, from where it looked like their four-Test unbeaten streak would not extend to five. The feisty draw, broadcast live to global audiences, could have wide-ranging, long-lasting ripples.

“I’m sure from here on, she’ll go from strength to strength and will be very, very important to the batting of the Indian team, in all formats.”Mithali Raj on Shafali Verma

For starters, Verma is still uncapped in ODIs. For the home series against South Africa in March, she didn’t receive a call-up for the 50-overs assignment. (The team management or selectors never explained why.) But the Bristol Test left little room for any uncertainty to cloud Verma’s immediate future.The England tour now transitions into its limited-overs leg. A maiden 50-over appearance for India in the three-ODI series should only be a matter of (a week’s) time. In the larger scheme of things, discussions around the playing combination and putting on competitive first-innings totals leading into the 2022 ODI World Cup must start revolving around Verma’s role.”I’m sure from here on, she’ll go from strength to strength and will be very, very important to the batting of the Indian team, in all formats,” Raj said. “She beautifully adapted to this format. She didn’t go like how she would go bonkers in the T20 format. Sensibly she played the new ball and it’s great to have her.”Shafali Verma had the opportunity to share the dressing room with the likes of England and Velocity batter Danielle Wyatt in the Women’s T20 Challenge•BCCIIt couldn’t be more ironic that Verma now sits atop the list of most runs by a Test debutant without a first-class cap. The Bristol draw was India’s first Test in nearly seven years. The three-day senior women zonal tournament, the only domestic red-ball domestic event, ceased to exist after the 2017-18 season. The absence of an Under-16 national competition means an entire demographic remains untapped or under-exposed or both until the players reach the Under-19s and Under-23 competitions.Against the backdrop of the dearth of a well-outlined pathway for female cricketers in India, Verma’s journey to a Test cap remains something of a study in the relation between intent and talent-nurturing. At the Haryana men’s camp earlier in the year, Verma was the only female player. It was the Haryana Cricket Association, her state unit, that ensured Verma got a regular hit at the nets, in practice matches, and took part in the fitness sessions alongside the men’s players.”I had to even remind my bowlers, ‘ (Don’t go easy on her because a girl; she might take you to the cleaners),'” Sharma, who led the opposition team in the practice games featuring Verma at the Haryana camp, remembers. “All of us bowlers gave our 100 per cent. There was no leniency because she is a girl. We knew we were up against a good batter.”For all the paucity of Test cricket for women internationally and of a structure that assists planned, long-term development of India’s female cricketers, Verma’s record-breaking debut in the longest format remains a success story like no other. Imagine what could happen if India got down to unearthing talent by design, not by accident.

Adapting to UAE conditions key as New Zealand eye second world title in 2021

Being in a group full of Asian oppositions could prove a test if the pitches are slow and low

Deivarayan Muthu21-Oct-2021

Big picture

Just four months ago, Kane Williamson and Ross Taylor sealed victory in the World Test Championship final, leaving the New Zealand public clamouring for image of the pair walking off to be immortalised as a statue at the Basin Reserve. New Zealand are now out to have another crack at a world title in the same year, but at this T20 World Cup in the UAE, they will have to do so without Taylor – their joint-most-capped player in T20Is – and there are also some (minor) concerns over Williamson’s fitness in the lead-up to the tournament.Related

  • Lockie Ferguson ruled out of T20 World Cup with calf tear

  • Guptill hopes to draw confidence from 2016 T20 World Cup performance to turn UAE form around

  • Williamson on course for T20 World Cup opener

  • T20 World Cup prize money: Title winners to get $1.6 million

  • Fit-again Conway ready to create World Cup 'legacy' after Test high

New Zealand dominated their most recent home summer, which saw the emergence of Glenn Phillips and Devon Conway, winning 10 of the 13 completed T20Is. From thriving on easy-paced hit-through-the line tracks on small grounds, Williamson’s men will have to adapt quickly to the slow, low pitches on bigger grounds in Dubai and Abu Dhabi.It helps New Zealand that ten of their 16 squad players were part of the recently concluded IPL, and they can also draw some confidence from the past. In the 2016 T20 World Cup group-stage game in Nagpur, they benched Tim Southee, Trent Boult and Mitchell McClenaghan to accommodate three spinners in Mitchell Santner, Ish Sodhi and Nathan McCullum – and stunned India on a rank turner.While Williamson has already indicated that conditions will decide New Zealand’s XI, facing India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh – if they qualify for the tournament proper – will be a tricky proposition.

Recent form

None of New Zealand’s World Cup squad players travelled to Bangladesh, where a Tom-Latham-led second-string side lost the T20I series 3-2. The subsequent tour to Pakistan was called off amid security concerns, minutes before the first ODI was scheduled to begin in Rawalpindi. However, a good chunk of New Zealand’s players have been active in franchise cricket, including the IPL, CPL, the Hundred and the Vitality Blast.

Batting

Phillips and Conway have evolved into versatile middle-order batters, and a fit Williamson could have a big role to play, but there could be a bit of trouble at the top if Martin Guptill and Tim Seifert can’t maximise the powerplay in these conditions. Guptill has played nine T20 games in the UAE, scoring 126 runs at an average of 14 and a strike rate of 104.13. Seifert has had stints with the Knight Riders’ franchises in the CPL and IPL but has played just 10 T20s in Asia.Jimmy Neesham and Daryl Mitchell, picked ahead of Colin de Grandhomme, will be tasked with the responsibility of finishing the innings.Lockie Ferguson could be a vital cog in the bowling line-up•Getty Images

Bowling

Having recovered from injury and Covid-19, Lockie Ferguson proved his form and fitness for Kolkata Knight Riders in their run to the final in IPL 2021. Ferguson can devour oppositions with his breakneck speed, which most subcontinent teams aren’t used to facing. Adam Milne, who was in stellar form in the Hundred, could have added more X-factor to New Zealand’s attack, but the team management has instead leaned towards the experience of Boult and Southee, keeping Milne as a reserve bowler.New Zealand don’t have a specialist offspinner although Phillips is open to doing the job against left-handers. Santner was the only New Zealander who didn’t get a game in this IPL, but head coach Gary Stead believes he will be able to shake off the rust during the warm-up games.Kyle Jamieson had impressed with his change-ups in Chennai during the first leg of the IPL, but his T20 form has tapered off since. In his last seven T20s, he has managed just a solitary wicket at an economy rate of 10.09.

Player to watch

Ferguson aside, Phillips has become a sought-after T20 package. In addition to being the top six-hitter in T20s this year, Phillips is one of the better players of spin in the New Zealand line-up, having honed his skills while working with Ramnaresh Sarwan at the CPL. A back condition has limited his ability to keep wicket in recent times, but he can aggressively patrol the outfield and bowl quickish offspin.

Key question(s)

Do New Zealand have enough depth in their squad? They’ve picked only one reserve player in Milne, and left out compelling T20 options in Colin Munro and Finn Allen. If the ball doesn’t swing or seam around, how effective will Boult or Southee be in the UAE?

Likely XI

1 Martin Guptill, 2 Tim Seifert (wk), 3 Kane Williamson (capt), 4 Devon Conway, 5 Glenn Phillips, 6 Jimmy Neesham, 7 Mitchell Santner, 8 Kyle Jamieson/Daryl Mitchell, 9 Lockie Ferguson, 10 Ish Sodhi, 11 Trent Boult/Tim Southee

Game
Register
Service
Bonus